Re: question on backends - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
Subject Re: question on backends
Date
Msg-id 20020729161119.GA7756@klamath.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: question on backends  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: question on backends
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:28:54PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> libpq has a function pconnect as opposed to connect that will do it.

libpq has neither function, AFAIK.

As for persistent backends, it's on the TODO list, but I'm not aware
that anyone has put any work into implementing it. At the moment,
a backend connects to a single database for its entire lifecycle -- so
you'd either need one pool of persistent backends for each database
in use, or you'd need to allow a backend to change the database it is
connected to.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?