Tom Lane wrote:
> > This is particularly
> > significant for thisxactonly relations.
>
> Yes. After thinking awhile I realize that the real problem is that we
> are trying to swap between an existing relation (!rd_myxactonly) and
> a new relation (rd_myxactonly). Buffers for one live in the main
> buffer pool, for the other in the local buffer pool. There's also the
> little matter of the local state inside relcache.c. While the update
> to pg_class should make the right things happen to relfilenode, it
> doesn't do anything to cause a change in rd_myxactonly status.
Yes, I had one intermediate patch where I was calling
RelationClearRelation directly and not using the reload flag computed by
RelationForgetRelation. Then I found RelationFlushRelation and that
seemed to work better.
This case is actually more complicated because after the swap, pg_class
still says thisxactonly but the relfilenode points to non-thisactonly
buffers, and via versa. One of the key things is that thisxactonly
relations can't be forgotten because there are local buffers associated
with the relation, or something like that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
