Re: Unintegrated stuff in source tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Unintegrated stuff in source tree
Date
Msg-id 200207100306.g6A36AL19678@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Unintegrated stuff in source tree  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Unintegrated stuff in source tree
Re: Unintegrated stuff in source tree
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration.  I am
> particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx.  No
> doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as they are right
> now they're a headache waiting to happen.
> 
> Could someone try to address the following issues?
> 
> SSL:
> 
> * A bunch of cryptic configuration files -- what do they do?
> 
> * Weird shell scripts -- what do they do?
> 
> * The shell scripts are written in a completely unportable fashion and
> have inappropriate names (surely PostgreSQL isn't the only application in
> the world that allows to "mkcert").
> 
> * They don't even belong into interfaces.
> 
> * No build instructions, let alone a makefile.

I have requested info from the ssl author with no replies.  Yank it from
CVS or I will do the honors.

> Libpqxx:
> 
> * I'm no C++ whizz, but I guarantee that this coding style is not nearly
> as portable as we've tried to make libpq++ be.  Who wants to answer those
> support calls all over again?
> 
> * What's the deal with libpq++ vs. libpqxx?  Who's going to want to
> explain that to the crowd for the next 5 years?
> 
> * Bogus Automake stuff -- hurts my eyes. ;-)
> 
> * Doxygen -- is that going to be a quasi-required tool now?
> 
> * Bonus points for documentation in DocBook format -- but unfortunately
> version 4.1, and unfortunately not integrated with the rest of the
> documentation set.
> 
> * No build integration.
> 
> * Why are half the text files executable?
> 
> Personally, I'm uneasy about carrying around another interface library
> that appears to have no basis in any sort of standard.

The idea was that someone with more knowledge of PostgreSQL would
integrate the new C++ interface into our build system.  If it doesn't
happen, we will yank it before 7.3.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_access
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unintegrated stuff in source tree