Re: Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: Large Objects
Date
Msg-id 20020627095045.C19070@zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Large Objects  (Nadim Bitar <nadiizu@earthlink.net>)
Responses Re: Large Objects
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:11PM -0700, Nadim Bitar wrote:
>
>
> I have a collection of images that I want to store in a database. The
> collection is currently 12 GB.

 Are you sure? Why not use standard FS and to DB store path to files? :-)

> Can anyone give me some advice or links to any documents that discuss
> the different methods to accomplish this. I already read techdocs
> documents related to large objects. I just want some advice on good ways
> to do it.

 The current PostgreSQL allows to store large data to standard table
 rows too. You needn't use large-object interface.

> The database is going to be accessed through a Servlet (JDBC).
> One thing that wasn't clear from techdocs was the disk space usage. If i
> store 12 GB in the database without deleting it from the filesystem, it
> is going to occupy another 12 GB. Is this right?

 Sure. The database use own and private dataspace and not links to
 some external files.

    Karel

--
 Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
 http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

 C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvar Freude
Date:
Subject: Re: Still problems with memory swapping and server load
Next
From: "Alison Stevenson"
Date:
Subject: user defined functions