Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 05:48:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I can add it to CVS as interfaces/libpqxx and we can then let others
> > merge your configure tests into our main configure. Let me know when
> > you want it dumped into CVS.
>
> Might as well do it right now, with 0.5.2. We'll call that 1.0, and
> leave the more radical future plans for 2.0.
>
> There are some things I'd like to do in future 1.x releases that will
> affect the interface:
> - nonblocking operation, probably as a latency-hiding tuple stream;
> - change the way you select the quality of service for your transactor;
> - allow notice processors to have C++ linkage;
> - addtional bits & bobs like field and column iterators.
>
> OTOH there's no point in delaying 1.0 forever I guess.
>
> FWIW, I'm thinking of doing at least one of the following in 2.0:
> - an easy-to-use but intrusive object persistence layer;
> - offload some of the work to BOOST if possible;
> - adapt the interface to be more database-portable.
>
> But back to 1.0... Would it be a useful idea to also integrate my own
> CVS history into the main tree? Or should I just keep developing in
> my local tree and submit from there?
I think we will just give you CVS access. Not sure how to get the CVS
history. I think if you send me the CVS root I can use CVS import to
load it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
