Greg Copeland wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Well, it occurred to me that if a large result set were to be identified
> before transport between a client and server, a significant amount of
> bandwidth may be saved by using a moderate level of compression.
> Especially with something like result sets, which I tend to believe may
> lend it self well toward compression.
>
> Unlike FTP which may be transferring (and often is) previously
> compressed data, raw result sets being transfered between the server and
> a remote client, IMOHO, would tend to compress rather well as I doubt
> much of it would be true random data.
>
I should have said compressing the HTTP protocol, not FTP.
> This may be of value for users with low bandwidth connectivity to their
> servers or where bandwidth may already be at a premium.
But don't slow links do the compression themselves, like PPP over a
modem?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
