Re: referential constraint bug - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: referential constraint bug
Date
Msg-id 20020313081032.W81426-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to referential constraint bug  (Eric Lu <yclu@ecompliance.net>)
Responses Re: referential constraint bug
Re: referential constraint bug
Re: referential constraint bug
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Eric Lu wrote:

> To whom it may concern:
>
>  I found a constraint bug on PostgreSQL lastest version (7.2).

Yes, it's still seeing some invalid states of the table. I believe
the following will fix the case (it was part of a larger patch that
was rejected, but I think this part is safe -- if not I'm sure someone
will jump in).

*** pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c.orig    Tue Mar 12 23:33:32 2002
--- pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c    Tue Mar 12 23:33:47 2002
***************
*** 208,213 ****
--- 208,224 ----
          new_row = trigdata->tg_trigtuple;
      }

+         /*
+          * We should not even consider checking the row if it is no longer
+          * valid since it was either deleted (doesn't matter) or updated
+          * (in which case it'll be checked with its final values).
+          */
+         if (new_row) {
+                 if (!HeapTupleSatisfiesItself(new_row->t_data)) {
+                         return PointerGetDatum(NULL);
+                 }
+         }
+
      /* ----------
       * SQL3 11.9 <referential constraint definition>
       *    Gereral rules 2) a):

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed
Next
From: Ben Grimm
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed