Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to
Date
Msg-id 200202280356.g1S3u1921476@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> In general, Postgres' query plans *do* depend on the values of
> constants, and it's not always possible to produce an equally good plan
> that doesn't assume anything about constants.  This is why I think it's
> a lousy idea for the system to try to automatically abstract a
> parameterized query plan from the actual queries it sees.  On the other
> hand, an application programmer will have a very good idea of which
> parts of a repeated query are really constant and which are parameters.
> So what we really need is preparable parameterized queries, wherein the
> application tells us what to parameterize, rather than having to guess
> about it.

I think we could store the constants that went with the saved plan and
re-use the plan if the new constants were _similar_ to the old ones. 
(Of course, figuring out _similar_ is the trick here.)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Point in time recovery: recreating relation files
Next
From: "Dominic J. Eidson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )