> Well, I do. We don't need the separate user-side error functions
> initially, but eventually we will have to have them.
>
> So, basically, what this comes down to with respect to your patch:
>
> 1. Renumbering the error codes breaks backward compatibility *silently*.
OK, so people want the old codes kept. I just have to warn people that
there will be some funky test structure in elog.c to handle message
*_min_messages tests. Is that OK?
> 2. CRASH doesn't seem like a good name to me.
OK, changed to FATALALL, which is pretty descriptive.
> 3. I agree with adding a LOG or INFO level between DEBUG and NOTICE.
OK, good, that was the crux of the patch. The rest was cleanups.
>
> 4. I don't like the alignment change. That seems very un-computer-like.
OK, removed, not always two spaces.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
