Hi Jean-Michel,
I just started browsing this list again after a long absence...
* Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr> [020221 18:39]:
> 5) Surrogate pairs
> I heard PostgreSQL did not support surrogate pairs. Is this a problem of
> surrogate pair? Just my 0.02 cents, I know very little about UTF-8.
Surrogate pairs only exist in UTF-16. They are used to access
characters which are not on the BMP.
UTF-8 has a different way to encode these characters. Encoding
surrogates in UTF-8 is invalid and should be rejected by any
application receiving a UTF-8 stream (actually, they used to be just
irregular, but starting with Unicode 3.2, they will be illegal).
Regarding your sequence E3/82/27, it cannot be valid under any scheme.
UTF-8 is done in a way that any subsequent byte is equal or above
0x80. For E3 in particular, the 3rd byte has to be between 80 and BF.
Anyway "UTF-8 encoded surrogates" can only start with ED, so that's
not your problem here.
Hope this helps.
Patrice
--
Patrice Hédé
email: patrice hede à islande org
www : http://www.islande.org/
