Re: IN optimization in 7.2 ????? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: IN optimization in 7.2 ?????
Date
Msg-id 20020218164031.A23194@depesz.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IN optimization in 7.2 ?????  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IN optimization in 7.2 ?????  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Not that I know of.

strange. what could lead to this results then?
i used to think that IN (SELECT ...) is the slowest possible way at all.

depesz

p.s. of course both select's use indices, and table is vacuumed

--
hubert depesz lubaczewski                          http://www.depesz.pl/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
... vows are spoken to be broken ...                 [enjoy the silence]
... words are meaningless and forgettable ...             [depeche mode]

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Can somebody save my bacon?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: IN optimization in 7.2 ?????