Re: Yet another optimizer index choosing questions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Yet another optimizer index choosing questions
Date
Msg-id 20020124170027.T35837-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Yet another optimizer index choosing questions  (Elein <elein@nextbus.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Elein wrote:

>
> I have a four part primary key and only qualify
> the query on the table against the first part of
> the primary key.
>
> When I do the query, it never uses the primary key
> index.
>
> Does postgres use partial indexes at all?
> If so, the distribution of this one part of a primary
> key is very even.  That is, each bucket has a
> similar count.
>
> I created a separate index on the first part of
> the primary key and the query used it and cut down
> the cost of the query significantly.
>
> The table has about 50K rows but the
> original query eats enough memory to choke postgres
> (yes, yes, I'll throw more memory at it, too).
> The query using the additional index works well.
>
> Why did I have to create a second index?  Why
> didn't it use a partial of the primary key index?

It should be willing to use the first columns of the index
up until the first column not used for the scan AFAIK, can you send
the creates for the objects in question, queries and explain output?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another optimizer index choosing questions
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: persistent portals/cursors (between transactions)