Hi all,
senario: cursor 1 loop ( e.g. find student id ) cursor 2 loop ( e.g. find courses of this student ) cursor 3 loop
(e.g. update course information ) delele course detail ... or delete course detail ... ( same primary key )
insert course detail ... ( same primary key ) end loop 3 end loop 2 end loop 1
It did 75 delete actions 140 update actions ( delete
and insert ). The process time was about 5-6 minutes
while oracle was 10 seconds to 20 seconds .
postgresql.conf :
=================
shared_buffers = 3200
wal_buffers = 80
running on linux 7.1 , 512M ram.
M.T.
--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I will try to assign more memory to shared
> memory,
> > say 50M ~ 100M .
> >
> > I am runing something like that ..
> >
> > cursor loop 1
> > cursor loop 2
> > cursor loop 3
> > tmp = primary key
> > delete tmp ....
> > insert tmp ....
> > end loop 3
> > end loop 2
> > end loop 3
> >
> > will delete and insert record with same primary
> key
> > within a transaction reduce the performance ?
>
> Hmm, that might, is the tmp different for each
> combination of 1,2 and 3? I'm not really sure.
> You might also want to watch the backend's memory
> usage during the call to see how big it gets just
> to make sure there's not something bad happening.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
