Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From MindTerm
Subject Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Date
Msg-id 20011214033428.93468.qmail@web20203.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
List pgsql-sql
Hi all,
 I will try to assign more memory to shared memory,
say 50M ~ 100M . 
 I am runing something like that ..
 cursor loop 1  cursor loop 2    cursor loop 3    tmp = primary key     delete tmp ....    insert tmp ....   end loop 3
end loop 2 end loop 3
 

will delete and insert record with same primary key
within a transaction reduce the performance ?

M.T.

--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote:
> 
> >   I am writing a function (plpgsql) which equals
> to a
> > single transaction transaction in postgresql ( as
> I
> > known ). So I think that it is not a autocommmit
> mode.
> >
> >   I have add following lines in postgresql.conf.
> >
> > postgresql.conf:
> > ====================
> > shared_buffers = 640
> > wal_buffers = 80
> 
> It depends on how much memory you have, but even 640
> is pretty
> low (I think that works out to 5M).  Probably a few
> thousand
> is better if you've got the ram.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction