Re: Licensing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Licensing
Date
Msg-id 200112051848.fB5ImXV01284@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Licensing  (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>)
Responses Re: Licensing  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I may have some spare hacking time coming up, and I was thinking about
> adding a PL (Scheme) to PostgreSQL.  I've found some code out there
> for a small Scheme interpreter, but it appears to be licensed under a
> "BSD with advertising clause" license (as opposed to the "modern BSD"
> license of PostgreSQL).  The license text includes:
> 
>     Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> 
>     Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
>     the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>     distribution.
> 
> Would it be a problem to include this code in PG?  

I think it would be fine.  I don't think the old/new BSD license is any
major distinction.  We moved from old to new with no issues a while ago.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: Error using between on a numeric
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: Licensing