Re: make query faster?? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: make query faster??
Date
Msg-id 20011205101538.S16316-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: make query faster??  (DI Hasenöhrl <i.hasenoehrl@aon.at>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, [iso-8859-1] DI Hasen�hrl wrote:

> Thank you for your response, but I'm not quite clear.
>
> Is *sort_mem* the same as postgres' starting option -S *Sortsize*,
> which is by default 512Kb
> At this time I increased sortsize to 1024Kb, but the costs from
> explain are the same as before and I can't see, that the query is
> faster

IIRC the explain costs may not change.  If your table really only
has 4000 rows, I don't see why it would need to drop off to disk,
but while the query is running, you can see if pg_sorttemp* files
are being created under your data directory (which would show
that it is going out to disk and that you may need to raise -S
again).  Otherwise, is the data involved something you can share?
It might help for us to be able to try it elsewhere to see how
it performs.

> Please, can you explain, what *cost=341.63..341.63* means

It's an estimate of cost.  I believe the first is startup cost
and the last total cost.  You probably want to read the performance
tips section of the user's guide.




pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Any patch for delete and insert same row in a function ( transaction
Next
From: Roberto Mello
Date:
Subject: Getting matching and non-matching results (long)