Re: JDBC bug? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: JDBC bug?
Date
Msg-id 20011126155831.C5801@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC bug?  (Nate Gelbard <gelbardn@tripwire.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:02:53PM -0800, Nate Gelbard wrote:
>
>  > of a complaint on how SQL is case insensitive and if you have created
>  > your objects with quoted mixed case identifiers you need to accessthem
>  > via quoted mixed case identifiers.  I haven't seen any evidence that
>
> I am mistaken. This is actually a bug in the applications that are
> building SQL statements without quotes around tablenames of mixedcase.

Bad apps are everywhere. I've met quite a few that make the Oracle assumption
about casefolding: MixedCase == MIXEDCASE i.e. Oracle upcases everything.

The other place you'll hit this is NTFS (i.e. NT file system): names are
casepresevering but _not_ case sensitive, so MixEdCase == MIXEDCASE ==
mixecase all conflict, but will be stored (and returned) however the
app. (or user) spelled it the first time. Another example of being overly
helpful.

Ross

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC bug?
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC bug?