> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > Break the SQL code that has been implemented for prior versions??
> > > Bummer ;((.
> >
> > Yes, but we don't follow the MySQL behavior, which we copied when we
> > added LIMIT. Seems we should agree with their implementation.
>
> Isn't it much worse to not follow PostgreSQL behaviour than to not follow
> MySQL behaviour?
Well, it was on the TODO list and people complained while porting their
MySQL applications. We clearly made a mistake in the initial
implementation.
The question is do we fix it or continue with a different
implementation. Because we have the separate LIMIT and OFFSET we can
fix it while giving people a solution that will work for all versions.
If we don't fix it, all MySQL queries that are ported will be broken.
I assume it got on the TODO list because fixing it was the accepted
solution. We can, of course, change our minds.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
