Re: Embedded postgres ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John P. Looney
Subject Re: Embedded postgres ?
Date
Msg-id 20011015182908.B1539@antefacto.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Embedded postgres ?  (Henning Follmann <h.follmann@gmx.de>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:08:51AM -0400, Henning Follmann mentioned:
> >  I don't know it's architecture too well, though even with a very small
> > database, it seems to use a huge number of files, which are all quite
> > large, for the small amount of information in it.
> Well, this is not for what postgres was designed for.
> For embedded systems you are looking for databases that are optimised
> for running completely in memory. Also a SQL engine is maybe not well
> suited for embedded devices.

 Well, these days "embedded" means a lot more than 64k of RAM...

 I was hoping to be able to run a full RDBMS from a RAM disk. Though,
postgres seems to have the strange idea of a new file for each update.
This seems to chew through disk space.

 As well as tuning for massive systems, can you tune it to a small system?

> Better would be databases like Berley DB or GDBM. They are though not
> comparable to RDBMS like postgres, etc...

 Indeed. We are using TDB at the moment; nice, small...but it doesn't
quite support joins or triggers :)

John

--
_______________________________________
John Looney             Chief Scientist
a n t e f a c t o     t: +353 1 8586004
www.antefacto.com     f: +353 1 8586014


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL and OpenOffice
Next
From: ÀîÁ¢ÐÂ
Date:
Subject: