Re: Bug #463: Make 'infinity' work with type 'date' - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Bug #463: Make 'infinity' work with type 'date'
Date
Msg-id 200110111649.f9BGnvW19966@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bug #463: Make 'infinity' work with type 'date'  (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
List pgsql-bugs
Can someone comment on this?  The problem appears in current sources:

    test=> INSERT INTO a VALUES ('infinity');
    ERROR:  Unrecognized date external representation 'infinity'

Is there a reason we support "infinity" in timestamp and not date?

> Dax Kelson (dax@gurulabs.com) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> Make 'infinity' work with type 'date'
>
> Long Description
> CREATE TABLE test ( somedate date NOT NULL DEFAULT 'infinity' );
> ERROR: Unrecognized date external representation of 'infinity'
>
> But,
>
> CREATE TABLE test ( somedate timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT 'infinity' );
>
> Works.
>
>
> Sample Code
>
>
> No file was uploaded with this report
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Date:
Subject: Bug #478: Integer overflow in pg_dump
Next
From: Lee Kindness
Date:
Subject: Btree index ignored on SELECT until VACUUM ANALYZE