Re: Pre-forking backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From sean-pgsql-hackers@chittenden.org
Subject Re: Pre-forking backend
Date
Msg-id 20010929192801.C46126@rand.tgd.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pre-forking backend  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Pre-forking backend
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > How hard would it be to pre-fork an extra backend
> 
> How are you going to pass the connection socket to an already-forked
> child process?  AFAIK there's no remotely portable way ...

Umm... Apache?  They use a preforking model and it works quite well for 
every *NIX that Apache runs on.  ;)  Maybe RSE can comment on this 
further... -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options