Re: syslog by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: syslog by default?
Date
Msg-id 200109121420.f8CEKcg06696@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: syslog by default?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: syslog by default?  ("Joel W. Reed" <jreed@support.ddiworld.com>)
Re: syslog by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> 
> > Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have
> > already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with
> > syslog()?
> 
> All the other functions we test for come with a replacement plan.  Either
> we choose between several similar alternatives (atexit/on_exit), or we
> link in our own function.o file.  But we don't shut off a whole piece of
> functionality when one goes missing (except in the cases I mentioned).
> 
> I'm probably being paranoid.  But you did ask what became of the idea, and
> that's what did, as far as I'm concerned...

OK, that makes sense.  My only question is how many platforms _don't_
have syslog.  If it is only NT and QNX, I think we can live with using
it by default if it exists.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Index location patch for review