Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Date
Msg-id 200107201603.f6KG31V16164@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Responses Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-general
> On Friday 20 July 2001 11:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree.
> The RPM additions are:
> 56      contrib-intarray.tar.gz
> 4       file-lists.tar.gz
> 180     jdbc7.0-1.1.jar
> 92      jdbc7.1-1.2.jar
> 8       migration-scripts.tar.gz
> 4       postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch
> 4       postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch
> 4       postgresql-bashprofile
> 4       postgresql-dump.1.gz
> 8       postgresql.init
> 20      README.rpm-dist
> 4       rh-pgdump.sh
> 8       rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch
>
> Of which the two jar files are derived from the source and wouldn't be
> necessary.  This totals 124K if I've done my math right.

Bag the JAR's and it looks fine.

> The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need
> to investigate this more closely....

Can you research that?  Why are they doing it?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)