Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Subject Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Date
Msg-id xuyzo9zchkc.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > On Friday 20 July 2001 11:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree.
> > The RPM additions are:
> > 56      contrib-intarray.tar.gz
> > 4       file-lists.tar.gz
> > 180     jdbc7.0-1.1.jar
> > 92      jdbc7.1-1.2.jar
> > 8       migration-scripts.tar.gz
> > 4       postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch
> > 4       postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch
> > 4       postgresql-bashprofile
> > 4       postgresql-dump.1.gz
> > 8       postgresql.init
> > 20      README.rpm-dist
> > 4       rh-pgdump.sh
> > 8       rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch
> >
> > Of which the two jar files are derived from the source and wouldn't be
> > necessary.  This totals 124K if I've done my math right.
>
> Bag the JAR's and it looks fine.
>
> > The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need
> > to investigate this more closely....
>
> Can you research that?  Why are they doing it?

It's a new one from upstream - it fixed some bugs, AFAIK.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Does dropping a column from a table mess up foreign keys?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Changes to C interface from 7.0 to 7.1