On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:45:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (But what the planner can recognize as matching a query's
> WHERE clause is currently much more restricted, just ANDs
> and ORs of simple VAR OP CONST clauses. This could be
> improved in the future.)
I've been think about adding IS (NOT) NULL type clauses and it doesn't look
too hard but I wonder if my logic is right.
> > Both the functions used in functional indexes and the
> > predicates used in partial indexes must be deterministic.
> > Are users responsible for it ?
>
> Yes. I don't see how the system could enforce that, without
> prohibiting lots of useful cases.
>
Well, isn't there an attribute on a function that indicates whether the same
input gives the same output (cachable?). I think that's all that would be
required and not restrict any useful cases.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
