Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines
Date
Msg-id 20010618192841.A20488@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines  (bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri))
Responses Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:21:56PM -0400, Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
> Dear Tom,
> > 
> > 
> > bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes:
> > > BTW, given the high level of support that you provide to the PostgreSQL
> > > community, it's very accurate to state that support for PostgreSQL
> > > is far superior to that of Oracle, especially for SGI systems.
> > 
> > It's all about having the source code available, I think.  After all,
> > it was you who identified the location of the problem...
> 
> Yes, but it's not just having the source code. Although I could see
> a potential problem, it was your knowledge of the source code to recommend
> a patch that worked immediately, and your willingness to help
> that together makes PostgreSQL support so good. The same knowledge and
> helpful attitude applies to all the PostgreSQL developers.

Gee, guys, I'm tearing up here. ;-)

sniff - 

Ross



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp with/without time zone