Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL
Date
Msg-id 3B2E935B.7D58A92E@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Update on Access 97 and = NULL  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > > Yet ... in the long run that does need to happen, I think.  Some day
> > > it'd be nice to see ODBC contain a full parser similar to ecpg's.
> >
> > Hmm I fear the strong binding between the driver and the server.
> > Would the parser always be backward compatible ?
> >
> AFAIK, we would need a completely new ODBC-SQL parser that perses the
> query and then reconstructs it in PostgreSQL-SQL before passing it
> forward
> unless it is for "pass-thru" queries that are the only ones meant to be
> sent directly.
> 

How could we know it's a "pass-thru" query ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc translation
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines