New Linux xfs/reiser file systems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date
Msg-id 200105021735.f42HZbY16618@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-hackers
I was talking to a Linux user yesterday, and he said that performance
using the xfs file system is pretty bad.  He believes it has to do with
the fact that fsync() on log-based file systems requires more writes.

With a standard BSD/ext2 file system, WAL writes can stay on the same
cylinder to perform fsync.  Is that true of log-based file systems?

I know xfs and reiser are both log based.  Do we need to be concerned
about PostgreSQL performance on these file systems?  I use BSD FFS with
soft updates here, so it doesn't affect me.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Fsync Slashdot discussion
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()