Re: On the _need_ to vacuum... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From geustace@godzone.net.nz
Subject Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Date
Msg-id 20010429043342.B59791B4DE@agree-6.godzone.net.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to On the _need_ to vacuum...  (Jack Bates <postgres@floatingdoghead.net>)
Responses Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
List pgsql-general
I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.

If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.

I don't want to start any form of war....
But as a user I'd be interested to know why such a patch would appear
to be unacceptable.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Glen Eustace,
GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd.,
P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5301
Ph/Fax: +64 6 357 8168, Mob: +64 21 424 015



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Meeks
Date:
Subject: Joining more than 2 tables
Next
From: Jeff Waugh
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: crypt(table.field) ?