Tom,
I experimented with different ways to do this patch and discussed this
with Jason Tischler, and I now conclude that the meaning of DLLLIBS in
the two makefiles is different enough that it doesn't make sense to
try to factor-out common information to share between them.
So I wish to withdraw my proposed patch entirely, leaving the two
definitions of DLLLIBS as is. My apologies for the confusion.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:48:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes:
> > I now think that backend/Makefile is meant to override the definition
> > of DLLLIBS in makefiles/Makefile.win so that the build of the backend
> > will not try to link with itself (i.e., -L$(top_builddir)/src/backend
> > -lpostgres).
>
> It seems like the real problem here is that DLLLIBS is being used for
> two different purposes. How about offering a patch that splits it into
> two symbols, with no redefinition/overriding necessary?
--
Fred Yankowski fred@OntoSys.com tel: +1.630.879.1312
Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370
OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
