Re: Re: Performance monitor' - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: Performance monitor'
Date
Msg-id 200103131549.KAA13676@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance monitor  (Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes:
> 
> > > > Small question... Will it work in console? Or it will be X only?
> > >
> > > It will be tck/tk, so I guess X only.
> > 
> > That's bad. Cause it will be unuseful for people having databases far away...
> > Like me... :-((( Another point is that it is a little bit strange to have 
> > X-Window on machine with database server... At least if it is not for play, 
> > but production one...
> 
> Well, I use X all the time over far distances - it depends on your
> connection... And you are not running an X server on the database server, only
> an X client.

Yes, works fine.

> But I agree that it would be nice to have monitoring architecture that
> allowed a multitude of clients...

Right now, pgmonitor is just 'ps' with some gdb/kill actions.  If I add
anything to the backend, you can be sure I will make it so any app can
access it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Next
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with fe/be protocol and large objects