Re: How robust is postgresql ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From will trillich
Subject Re: How robust is postgresql ?
Date
Msg-id 20010307135034.B7500@mail.serensoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How robust is postgresql ?  (John Madden <weez@freelists.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 02:18:41PM -0500, John Madden wrote:
> > You can do a database dump and back up the SQL generated, or do a
> > filesystem backup.  See
> > http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/admin/backup.html for
> > information on the specifics.
>
> Yum - can filesystem backups be done in 7.0.x?  (I would much prefer to
> killall -15 postmaster and copy files around than deal with pg_dump
> stuff.)  Or do I have to wait for 7.1?
>
> (If that's the case, I think I'll just not backup any databases until I
> can upgrade them ;))

you're brave, like i was, last week. i'm a bit more meek these
days... :)

i rather like the textual 'dump/restore' concept, as it'll
compress nicely, and can be diff'd easily for iterative backups,
as well. plus on recreating (when needed) you'll have the same
data but <guess>probably even cleaner datafiles than you'd have
after a vacuum.</guess> plus it's easy to do remote yanks via
`pg_dump -h server.host.name` without any nfs or other clutter...

--
It is always hazardous to ask "Why?" in science, but it is often
interesting to do so just the same.
        -- Isaac Asimov, 'The Genetic Code'

will@serensoft.com
http://newbieDoc.sourceforge.net/ -- we need your brain!
http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Roderick A. Anderson"
Date:
Subject: Update through views?
Next
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: RE: SELECT performance drop v 6.5 -> 7.0.3