Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date
Msg-id 20010218105610.B23980@lerami.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [010218 10:53]:
> Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com> writes:
> > fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves
> > as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us.
> 
> Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something
> useful, but it doesn't.  I'd recommend an experiment.  Does today's
> snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before?
BTW, UnixWare 7.1.1 does *NOT* have fdatasync.  What standard created
this one? 


> 
>             regards, tom lane
-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Next
From: Jerome Vouillon
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL and commit_delay