Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date
Msg-id 12206.982515110@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com>)
Responses Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers))
Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com> writes:
> fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves
> as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us.

Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something
useful, but it doesn't.  I'd recommend an experiment.  Does today's
snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2 vs 2.4
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay