Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?
Date
Msg-id 200102070342.WAA14495@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?  (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
List pgsql-bugs
This is fixed in the current 7.1 snapshot.


> Paul M. Aoki (aoki@acm.org) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?
>
> Long Description
> org.postgresql.largeobject.LargeObject.read(byte[],int,int) returns void instead of int.  there's therefore no
reliable,non-exceptional way to detect short reads. 
>
> the natural way to write blocked-read loops would be to assume that read(byte[],int,int) returned the number of bytes
reador (e.g.) -1 on EOF. 
>
> Sample Code
>
>
> No file was uploaded with this report
>
>


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken?
Next
From: Nat Howard
Date:
Subject: 7.1beta4 jdbc problem on freebsd 4.2 with JSDK 1.1.8.