Re: Re: [BUGS] no way in LargeObject API to detect short read? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From aoki@acm.org (Paul M. Aoki)
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?
Date
Msg-id 200101261912.f0QJCj728572@faerie.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [BUGS] no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?  (Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk> writes:
> Hmmm, what's the performance issues with this? Is there going to be a problem
> with very large LargeObject's?

you could probably be smarter about caching previous tell() state, if
that's what you mean.

jun's hack doesn't actually add any extra buffers or copies.
--
 Paul M. Aoki / Xerox Palo Alto Research Center / 3333 Coyote Hill Road
 aoki@acm.org / Computer Science Laboratory     / Palo Alto, CA 94304-1314

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Invoking sql functions through jdbc