Re: RE: [PATCHES] ODBC Patch for OJs/Large Querys & Rows - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: RE: [PATCHES] ODBC Patch for OJs/Large Querys & Rows
Date
Msg-id 200101251347.IAA10548@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: RE: [PATCHES] ODBC Patch for OJs/Large Querys & Rows  (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses RE: RE: [PATCHES] ODBC Patch for OJs/Large Querys & Rows
List pgsql-odbc
> Yes, that could happen, though in reality I suspect it proably wouldn't as
> (in my experience - I may be wrong) those technologies do little more than
> putting SELECT * FROM in front of a given table name and generating query
> based updates.
>
> I suspect that more problems may be caused for apps like MS Query or Seagate
> Crystal Reports which might attempt to use outer joins on an older database
> (actually Query just enables/disables the relevant join options). As far as
> I can tell, the driver doesn't check the backend version (despite returning
> the DBMS version which is currently hardcoded), so we'd either need to add a
> 7.1 protocol option (not nice as it isn't really a different protocol) or do
> a SELECT VERSION() on connect to get the exact version string and figure out
> what is/isn't possible from that.
>
> I'll look into it but I'm on the wrong end of the learning curve here!

We usually are more concerned about old libraries talking to new
servers.  New libraries talking to old servers are not needed as much.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: RE: ODBC patches
Next
From: Alfonso Peniche
Date:
Subject: serial values and odbc