Seems we decided against this. Sorry.
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > I can't decide if this is of general use. My inclination is that
> > > someone in a transaction sitting a prompt should still show as idle.
> >
> > The idea seemed good to me, although I didn't look at the code to see
> > if the implementation was any good ;-). I know we've frequently had
> > questions on the lists where it was interesting to know if any
> > transactions were being held open --- and right now there's no easy
> > way to tell.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
>
> I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> long for me)
> The patch is _trivial_ a string changed to a condifional operator and two
> strings (two times). A two liner.
>
> Christof
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
