Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You are confusing the syntax for a typed literal with part of the AT
>> TIME ZONE construct.
> Could you explain what the difference is between a typed literal
> "int '11'" and a cast(ed) literal "'11'::int" to me they seem like the
> same thing.
Yes, they are semantically the same. The first one is a kluge that Tom
Lockhart put in to approximate the SQL spec's demands for representation
of timestamp and interval constants. It does not work syntactically to
try to extend it to a general cast construct (we can only barely manage
to support it as-is --- there are various special cases that don't work
such as arrays and qualified type names, and a depressingly large part
of gram.y is devoted to getting the cases that do work to work). Even
if we could get the parser to cope with that without reduce/reduce
errors, we'd be greatly reducing the grammar's ability to detect actual
syntax errors, because practically anything next to practically anything
else would become a potentially legal cast construct.
So, no "INTERVAL $1". Bad enough we have to take "INTERVAL 'string'".
This wasn't one of the SQL committee's better ideas.
regards, tom lane
