* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001128 22:55]:
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> >> Here is the "Current" /usr/include/machine/lock.h:
> >> ...
> >> void s_lock __P((struct simplelock *));
> >> ...
>
> Ick. Seems like the relevant question is not so much "why did it break"
> as "how did it ever manage to work"?
>
> I have no problem with renaming our s_lock, if that's what it takes,
> but I'm curious to know why there is a problem now and not before.
> We've called that routine s_lock for a *long* time, so it seems
> like there must be some factor involved that I don't see just yet...
Didn't your commit message say something about the TAS and NON-TAS
paths being the same now?
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
