My feeling is "Let's walk before we run." We need psql \dt to show
primary/foreign keys and SERIAL first.
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Why can't COPY recognize for itself that rebuilding the indexes after
> >> loading data is a better strategy than incremental index update?
> >> (The simplest implementation would restrict this to happen only if the
> >> table is empty when COPY starts, which'd be sufficient for pg_dump.)
>
> > COPY would have to check to see if the table is already empty.
>
> That's what I said ... or intended to say, anyway. If there's already
> data then the tradeoff between incremental update and index rebuild is
> not so obvious, and the easiest first implementation would just be to
> always do incremental update in that case. Or we could add an option
> to the COPY command to tell it which to do, and let the user do the
> guessing ;-)
>
> There'd also be a locking issue, now that I think about it: to do an
> index rebuild, we'd have to be sure that no other transaction is adding
> data to the table at the same time. So we'd need to get a stronger lock
> than a plain write lock to do it that way. A COPY option is sounding
> better and better...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
