Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints
Date
Msg-id 200011221637.LAA20336@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The answer to that of course is that cross-table constraints (like
> REFERENCES clauses) must be disabled while loading the data, or the
> intermediate states where only some tables have been loaded are likely
> to fail.  So we do need some kind of DISABLE CONSTRAINT mode to make
> this work.  But it's silly that pg_dump has to go out of its way to
> create the indexes last --- if COPY has a performance problem there,
> we should be fixing COPY, not requiring pg_dump to contort itself.
> Why can't COPY recognize for itself that rebuilding the indexes after
> loading data is a better strategy than incremental index update?
> (The simplest implementation would restrict this to happen only if the
> table is empty when COPY starts, which'd be sufficient for pg_dump.)

COPY would have to check to see if the table is already empty.  You can
COPY into a table that already has data.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump / Unique constraints
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: regressplans failures