Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date
Msg-id 200010261948.PAA01310@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Responses Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Holger Klawitter wrote:
> >
> > > Pawel Wegrzyn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > What is the latest version of PostgreSQL?
> > > > Is there something like 7.1?
> > >
> > > The most recent version 7.0.2. 7.1 is about to come - I am looking
> > > forward to it as well.
> >
> > 7.0.3 is about to come out, 7.1 is about 2 months away yet :)
>
> How compatible with 7.0 and 7.1 be from an application standpoint?
> Will applications linked with libraries from 7.0 be able to talk to
> the 7.1 database?  Any changes in library major versions? The other
> way?

Historically, all applications have been able to talk to newer servers,
so a 6.4 client can talk to a 7.0 postmaster, and I believe 7.0 clients
can talk to 7.1 postmasters.

We usually do not go the other way, where 6.5 clients can not talk to
6.4 postmasters.  I believe 7.0->7.1 will be able to talk in any
7.0.X/7.1 client and server combination.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: oberpwd@anubis.network.com (Wade D. Oberpriller)
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternate locations of DB's (fwd)
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternate locations of DB's