Peter Mount's JDBC driver translates the query results from the postgresql
process to Java via the JDBC standard. As I see it, the source of your problem
can be at several levels.
1) A bug in the program
2) A bug in the Solaris JVM
3) A problem with the JDBC driver
4) A problem with your postgresql config on the solaris
#1 seems unlikely since your program and mine work on linux but not on solaris
#2 seems unlikely since Solaris is the flagship for Sun's Java efforts
#3 is possible, but our programs _and_ JDBC work fine under linux
#4 is the only possibility we have not discussed.
The first way to test if the solaris configuration of postgresql is the problem
is to test a query using an interface which is _not_ JDBC. The simpliest, is
psql. Test the large-object support using lo_import and lo_export from within
psql. In the documentation, section IV (Interfaces)-- chapter 51 (Large Objects)
has a page called 'Built in registered functions'. This page shows an example of how
to 'manually' store and retrieve a large-object which can be typed into the psql
interface and tested. If lo_import and lo_export work, but JDBC does _not_ work. We should get Peter
Mount's direct attention. I don't know if he's familiar with solaris, but might be
able to point you toward a solution based on your stack trace.Buena Suerte,Dave
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:42:17 +0200, you wrote:
> David Huttleston Jr escribi�:
>
> > Hey Gabi,
> > Have you manually tested this query in using the pqsl interface? Perhaps
> > it is the backend having problems and not JDBC.
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
> What do you want to say?
> I run your program. The problem in the postgresql?
>
>
>
> --
> Gabriel L�pez Mill�n
> Facultad de Inform�tica -Universidad de Murcia
> 30001 Murcia - Espa�a (Spain)
> Telf: +34-968-364644 E-mail: gabilm@dif.um.es
>
>
>
