Re: Blown Index? Corrupted Table? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adam Haberlach
Subject Re: Blown Index? Corrupted Table?
Date
Msg-id 20001006124619.A32282@ricochet.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Blown Index? Corrupted Table?  (Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> I've been getting this on and off in my vaccums.  Once it happens, the only way to
> make it go away seems to be a dump/restore.  Is this bad, Bad, or BAD?
>
> NOTICE:  Index idx_rawbebugs_assignedto: Pages 112; Tuples 31161: Deleted 0. CPU 0.01s/0.10u sec.
> NOTICE:  Rel rawbebugs: Pages: 4435 --> 4400; Tuple(s) moved: 0. CPU 0.04s/0.01u sec.
> NOTICE:  FlushRelationBuffers(rawbebugs, 4400): block 287 is referenced (private 0, global 1)
> FATAL 1:  VACUUM (vc_repair_frag): FlushRelationBuffers returned -2

Ok.  It looks like I have one or more Relations pinned in my cache, according
to the source code.  Do I need to kick all of the connections out of the
database in order to vaccum?  AFAIK, there isn't anyone accessing at the
time (and I tried shutting down httpd while running the vacuum).

--
Adam Haberlach            | A billion hours ago, human life appeared on
adam@newsnipple.com       | earth.  A billion minutes ago, Christianity
http://www.newsnipple.com | emerged.  A billion Coca-Colas ago was
'88 EX500                 | yesterday morning. -1996 Coca-Cola Ann. Rpt.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Adam Lang"
Date:
Subject: Re: image storing
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: image storing