Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Subject Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?
Date
Msg-id 20000829101238Y.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Oh, the patch strikes me since it is not "multibyte aware."  Are you
> > going to put it into the CVS? If so, please let me know after you do
> > it so that I could add the multibyte awareness to that.
>
> Well, I meant it to go into CVS, if noone objected. I consider your raising
> the multibyte issue sufficent objection to have it held off. No point
> patching and repatching.

No problem for repatching I think, since we are in the development
cycle anyway.

> The problem is that I just chop it off at NAMEDATALEN, which might be
> in the middle of a multibyte character, correct?

Exactly.

> Ah, I see code in parser/scan.l that does the multibyte aware version
> of the chop. Should I just rewrite my patch with that code as a model?

Please do so. If you need any help, please let me know.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT