Re: TOAST & vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: TOAST & vacuum
Date
Msg-id 200007220928.LAA08420@hot.jw.home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TOAST & vacuum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck) writes:
> >     TOAST  is now vacuum-safe. When needed, the toaster creates a
> >     second  heap  tuple,  containing  only  plain  or  compressed
> >     values.  This one is then returned by the heap access methods
> >     to  the  caller,  so  indices  will  never  contain  external
> >     references.
>
> That should be sufficient for insertions into existing indexes,
> but what about CREATE INDEX on a column that already contains
> toasted values?  That works with fetched tuples, not ones formed
> during insert/update.
>
> I think a cleaner and more reliable short-term hack would be to twiddle
> index_formtuple() to detoast any externally-stored attributes.  AFAIK,
> in current sources all paths for creating an index tuple go through that
> routine, and it has a tupdesc handy so it knows which attributes are of
> varlena type.
>
> This way you wouldn't need to hack up the tuptoaster itself.
   You're right. Will do it that way.

> Also, this would work for functional indexes whereas the way you are
> doing it will not (a function could return a toasted Datum extracted
> from some other table, no?).
   Don't know of a function that does it that way right now. But   that doesn't mean no such exists  -  you're  right
again. 2   donut's for U.
 


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump, libdump, dump API, & backend again
Next
From: JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccuum allows read access?