On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 03:58:40PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
> PostgreSQL's TODO list (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/todo.html) makes
> reference to implementing SQL3 recursive queries. Where does this task
> fall in the overall priority of things? I hate to just whine without
I want to implement this for some years now. But I haven't found the time to
even start yet.
> offering to help, but I think this would be a rather big bite to chew.
> (Actually, I would be happy to help, if anyone had any suggestions about
> what I might be able to do)
So at least we are two who are interested in this.
> Here's an example from DB2's documentation, cleaned up a bit:
Is this SQL3 syntax?
> with rpl (part, subpart, quantity) as
> (
> select root.part, root.subpart, root.quantity
> from partlist root
> where root.part = '01'
> union all
> select child.part, child.subpart, child.quantity
> from rpl parent, partlist child
> where parent.subpart = child.part
> )
Hmm, this doesn't look correct. What if a subpart is used by different
parts? I think the second query needs an aggregate.
But the above query certainly does solve the ancestor problem.
Does anyone have an idea how DB2 executes such a statement?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
