BTW, do you have an equally sensible explanation of how the "where condition" that is part of the rule syntax
differsfrom the where clause that comes after the "do instead"?
I don't know what you mean by these two different where conditions.
To my understanding the only instance of a where condition in the rule
is in the "do" part. Think of triggering the "do" part individually
for each view tuple to be updated. If you wish to act on a table, you
must identify how the parts of the current tuple identify a tuple or
tuples in the target table. That is the sole role of the "where"
condition in the "do" part of the rule.
Cheers,
Brook
