Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date
Msg-id 200001202258.RAA26330@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes  (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>)
List pgsql-general
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:18:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
> > > believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.
> >
> > Actually, oid data type is an unsigned int4.  If it does not behave that
> > way, it is a bug.
>
> is this just in pgsql, or in SQL in general?

Just PostgreSQL.  Others don't have oids.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sarah Officer
Date:
Subject: < and > for datetime
Next
From: Martin Schulze
Date:
Subject: Re: < and > for datetime